Track D - Interrogating opportunities to promote student teachers’ professionalism

Interrogating opportunities to promote student teachers’ professionalism through their engagement in critical enquiry on a postgraduate teacher training programme Shirley Allen and colleagues, Middlesex University School of Health and Education.

This session was facilitated by a group of staff members in the form of a workshop. Facilitators reported on their activities as a community of practice engaged in negotiating practice, meaning and identity to make their voices and that of their students heard. In this session the facilitators explained how certain events such as the re-accreditation of teacher training programmes and the move to e-assessment prompted them to interrogate opportunities for student engagement in critical enquiry. We experienced such opportunities in the form of activities which included group-based lateral thinking puzzles that emphasised the socio-constructivist approach to teaching and learning that the team had adopted.

The importance of ‘talk’ emerged as a central theme whereby students could explore critically their learning at University and the challenges of school placements. In fact, at the end of the session we had an opportunity to digitally record some of our talk using “talking tins”. This was in part a demonstration of how students might capture ‘talk’ to meet the requirements of e-assessment and to include as evidence in the new two part assessment alternative to the dissertation: Part 1 requires students to compile a portfolio of children’s learning experiences they have observed or taught in school and critically analyse and reflect on these experiences. In Part 2, students will discuss current theoretical and methodological approaches to learning, with a particular focus on socio-constructivist theory.

Report by Tarek Zoubir

Track A - Shaping dissertation research in dance & music theatre

Shaping dissertation research in dance and music theatre: critical approaches and shifting methodologies, Lise Uytterhoeven, Dr. Francis Yeoh, Josephine Leask, Laura Robinson, Julia Gleich, Mark Harris, London Studio Centre



Five team members from London Studio Centre presented on a dissertation module which forms part of recently validated (Hons) Theatre Dance degree programme. They commented on a number of recent case studies in terms of the methodological challenges they pose.

The dissertation is viewed as integral to enabling students to demonstrate their graduate-ness in this programme of study, in terms of developing key graduate skills. These include organising the student’s own learning, researching and evaluating a range of information, communicating complex insights, independent working and problem solving.

The ground work to prepare students for the final year dissertation is embedded in their earlier modules through various activities - allowing the students to develop skills in areas such as, planning, translating, evaluating, editing and communicating.

Recent methodological shifts in the wider field of dance studies had encouraged students, in conjunction with their tutors, to develope tailor-made research methodologies. These methodologies however, have presented new challenges.

The points raised included: some recent developments in dance studies require insights from other disciplines such as theatre studies, cultural studies, psychology anatomy/physiology or sociology. There is a lack of well documented resources, especially in contemporary developments, which leads to some case studies not been successful.

It is hard to ensure that the research been undertaken is linked to a career path.

If you would like to see the full presentation please click here

Report by Betty Sinyinza 

Track B - Work based projects as dissertations

Work based projects as dissertations: where’s the theory, where’s the practice? Ruth Miller and Alan Beadsmoore, Middlesex University School of Health and Education


Video of the session


An informative and thought provoking session, Ruth and Alan started with the similarities and differences between traditional dissertations and the contextualised projects that form part of work based learning professional practice programmes. One of the differences (referred to throughout the conference) was that students carrying out professional practice projects are internal inquirers as opposed to external researchers. The introduction of the student perspective via 3 students, who joined them for the session, broadened the session, enabling a deeper exploration of some of these differences.

As these students are based in the work place, leading projects that aim to make a change to something within their practice, a tripartite agreement between the students, the university and also the employer, is another distinguishing factor of these projects. The relationship between the student and university is more advisory than supervisory - a fundamental that students have to get to grips with – especially at undergraduate level.

The students Sandra, Jane and Irene (from left to right in the picture with Alan), gave a brief overview of their projects; BSc Mental Health “Developing a smoking cessation programme”, BA Professional Practice Early Years “Supporting children’s communication and language skills” and MSc Nursing Studies “Evaluating a stress reduction programme for nurses”, respectively. This prompted a flurry of questions from the floor, such as; what was it like being an insider researcher and how easy was it to achieve the level of independence required for inquiry? What were the advantages and disadvantages of inquiry inside an organisation – for example is the topic influenced by management? How did they manage to apply theory and relate it to their practice? What preparation did they have for selecting research methods? and How did they go about marrying the tension between tacit knowledge (what you just know) and academic theory?

For more questions and the varied answers from each of the students (including the final one “would they do it all again?”) – watch the video of the session (above).

Report by Louise Merlin

Work Based Projects from mdxaltc

Opening keynote - Carole-Anne Upton & Ifan Shepherd

Weighing it up: Research and the Undergraduate Dissertation in Media and Performing Arts Professor Carole-Anne Upton and  The Dissertation: Skylark or Albatross? Professor Ifan Shepherd

This year’s conference was opened by two keynote speakers drawn from within the University, these were Carole-Anne Upton, Professor of Theatre and Dean of the School of Media and Performing Arts and Ifan Shepherd, Professor of GeoBusiness at Middlesex University, and Director of Professional Practice Programmes in the Business School. They offered us complimentary and contrasting views and reflections on the role of the dissertation and other enquiry based modes, based the on their extensive experience of working with students in Higher Education; Carole-Anne focussed predominantly on undergraduate research and enquiry with Ifan concentrating on practice within the postgraduate area. It was clear that neither of them came to bury the dissertation but in fact, to praise the principles and values that it offered students with some caveats, words of warning and challenges to the audience.


Carole-Anne was concerned with the mystique that surrounded the dissertation with its language often residing in the language of traditional research and the ways that this impacted on both staff and students. She questioned the extent to which undergraduate research could really qualify as research and whether enquiry based learning was a more accurate title for this activity. Another challenge to teachers centred around the need and drive to increasingly support our students through the dissertation process that often meant that successful students continued to be successful but simply acted to identify failing students earlier without necessarily being able to improve their engagement. This in itself challenged the central principle of ‘extended independent enquiry’ that underpins the honours nature of the dissertation. Carole-Anne concluded that the dissertation certainly wasn’t dead but that it is possible overburdened; there is a need for us to be more explicit about its nature and role as a genuine act of research.

Ifan offered us some historical perspectives on the nature of Masters qualifications and the role of the dissertation as a ‘licence to research’, which has brought us to its current and continuing use within both practice and more theoretically driven programmes of study. He drew our attention to the consistent failure rates within Masters dissertations and questioned whether we were complicit in this failure by trying to pack mastery of subject and mastery of research within the confines of one-year Masters programmes. This was compounded by the expectations of originality that had previously been the domain of doctoral study in times gone by. Ifan offered us both sticking plasters and some more radical solutions that might help students’ approach to research; from asking students to evidence the actual impact of their reading on their dissertation rather than the generic literary review to rethinking the relationship between practice as research and the opportunities of being an insider researcher rather than an outsider looking in.

These perspectives on dissertation practices and problems offered a really useful opening to the conference that enabled conference participants to go to their workshop sessions with many of the key issues well and truly ‘outed’, in the words of Nicky Torrance and certainly at the forefront of their minds.

Report by Mike Seignor

Ifan Shepherd - The Dissertation: Skylark or Albatross? from mdxaltc

Registration and coffee

Delegate list 2013

Click link for: Delegates list

Click link for: Delegates list

Conference theme